◆ COMPARE
Compared honestly. Measured, not marketing.
Most "fastest RPC" claims are self-published by whoever wins them. Ours are different: every latency claim is reproducible from your own machine with solbench, our open-source benchmark - and where a comparison names another provider, it sticks to checkable facts (architecture, published pricing, documented features), never invented numbers.
◆ COMPARISONS
How rpc edge stacks up.
rpc edge vs public RPC
The free public endpoints are a genuinely good starting point - until you put real volume or real money through them. Here is the honest line between public RPC and a co-located trading stack.
Read the comparison →rpc edge vs Helius
Helius is the best-known developer platform on Solana, and it earns that. This page is about a narrower question - where the latency-critical trading path should live, and what it should cost.
Read the comparison →rpc edge vs QuickNode
QuickNode publishes a strong, reproducible read-latency benchmark and holds serious enterprise credentials. We compete on a different axis - the Solana write path and streaming stack it doesn't productize the same way.
Read the comparison →rpc edge vs Triton
Triton One wrote the Yellowstone gRPC standard the whole ecosystem runs on - including us. That deserves respect. It also means your client code is portable, and portability cuts both ways.
Read the comparison →rpc edge vs Shyft
Shyft is the budget pick for unmetered gRPC and pre-indexed DeFi data, and it's good at that. But Shyft is read-only - a trader on Shyft still needs a second vendor to land transactions. That seam is our whole product.
Read the comparison →rpc edge vs Nozomi
Nozomi is a serious transaction sender with a fair pricing model - you tip only when you land. But it's write-only. Your bot still buys its eyes somewhere else, and the loop between the two vendors is where latency hides.
Read the comparison →rpc edge vs bloXroute
bloXroute sells real landing-rate infrastructure to funded trading firms, and its benchmarks show it winning races. The honest difference is shape and price: an unbundled, fiat-billed pro stack versus one co-located endpoint at $249.
Read the comparison →// more provider comparisons are added as we publish measured, co-located benchmark data - grounded in numbers, not claims. want yours measured? DM us on Telegram. last updated 2026-07-13