◆ COMPARE

rpc edge vs Triton

Triton One wrote the Yellowstone gRPC standard the whole ecosystem runs on - including us. That deserves respect. It also means your client code is portable, and portability cuts both ways.

Get Started →View pricing →

◆ THE HONEST READ

Two strong providers, different jobs.

We build for one job - the latency-critical trading path. Triton One solves a broader set of problems. Here is the fair read of where each one fits.

rpc edge

Built for one job: the trading and HFT niche. The shortest, most predictable path between the cluster and a strategy.

No prepay to try it: a vetted 15-day trial with no card. Triton requires a $125 non-refundable, prepaid deposit before service activates - there is no free trial.
One opinionated bundle instead of a suite: decoded shreds + Yellowstone gRPC + transaction sender at $249 flat. Triton sells a sprawling catalog (Cloudbreak, Superbank, Fumarole, Vixen, Shield, Metis) that enterprises love and small desks have to navigate.
A productized, self-serve sender: Triton sunset its Cascade marketplace, and SWQoS delivery is now granted on request through support rather than sold as a product.
Named trading co-location where they aren't: Triton's Pro Trading Centers are Amsterdam and Tokyo. We are live co-located in Frankfurt, with the benchmark to show for it.

Triton One

Triton One is the enterprise Solana infrastructure incumbent: an original validator, author of Yellowstone gRPC and the Old Faithful archive, running bare-metal across 10+ datacenters with transparent pay-as-you-go pricing ($0.08/GB bandwidth, $10 per million standard calls) and named Pro Trading Centers in Amsterdam and Tokyo.

// where Triton is genuinely strong

They authored the standard: Yellowstone gRPC, Old Faithful, Vixen - the open-source stack most providers (including rpc edge) build on. Nobody has deeper protocol credibility.
Radically transparent pay-as-you-go pricing with no tier-gated throttling - a genuine attack on credit black boxes, published openly.
Serious production pedigree: bare metal across 3 continents, 99.99% uptime claims, and customers like Jupiter, Wintermute, Kamino, Phantom, and the Solana Foundation itself.
Their shred routing races DoubleZero Edge, Jito ShredStream, Turbine, and their own leaders in parallel - a sophisticated multi-source read path.

◆ SIDE BY SIDE

rpc edge vs Triton, by dimension.

A table flattens nuance - read it alongside the profiles above. Every cell is publicly known architecture and positioning, with no invented numbers.

Feature comparison of rpc edge and Triton One across infrastructure dimensions.
Dimension	rpc edge	Triton
Center of gravity	Co-located trading bundle	Enterprise Solana infrastructure suite
Entry friction	15-day vetted trial, no card	$125 non-refundable prepaid deposit, no free trial
Pricing shape	Flat $249 / $499 + included TB	Pay-as-you-go: $0.08/GB + per-call rates
Yellowstone gRPC	Included, every plan	They wrote it - core product
Transaction sender	Productized, self-serve, in-plan	Cascade sunset; SWQoS on request via support
Trading co-location	Frankfurt, live	Amsterdam + Tokyo Pro Trading Centers
History / archive	None	Old Faithful: 250+ TB, genesis to tip
OSS stewardship	Consumer of the standard	Author of the standard
Published benchmarks	Raw run published, tail included	Methodology blog + archive integrity reports, no live leaderboard
Best fit	Desks and bots that want one fast endpoint	Enterprises, validators, archive and data-heavy teams

◆ WHEN TO CHOOSE WHICH

Match the tool to the job.

Choose rpc edge if…

Choose rpc edge when you want the Yellowstone interface you already use, co-located with decoded shreds and a self-serve sender, live in minutes with no prepay. If Amsterdam and Tokyo don't cover your strategy and you don't need the enterprise suite, the bundle is the shorter path.

Choose Triton if…

Choose Triton One for enterprise scale, validator services, full-history archive access, or if you want to buy from the team that authors the standard. If you are in Amsterdam or Tokyo and want same-rack trading infrastructure from the incumbent, their Pro Trading Centers are the established option.

// not mutually exclusive - many teams run both, one for the product surface and one for the latency-critical path.

Frequently asked questions

Isn't rpc edge just reselling Triton's open-source work?

We build on Yellowstone gRPC, which Triton One authored and open-sourced - and we say so plainly. That's the point of an open standard: Triton themselves market that it lets you 'easily switch between providers.' What we add is the deployment: co-location, multi-source decoded shreds, and a productized sender in one flat-priced endpoint.

How does pricing actually compare?

Different shapes. Triton is pay-as-you-go - $0.08/GB bandwidth plus per-call rates, with a $125 non-refundable minimum deposit to start. rpc edge is flat: $249 Trader / $499 Desk in USDC with included monthly bandwidth, and a 15-day trial with no card and no deposit. Heavy, spiky streaming workloads should model both.

Is rpc edge faster than Triton?

We haven't benchmarked head-to-head and won't claim it. Triton runs serious infrastructure and races multiple shred sources in parallel. Our published number is our own: p50 104ms submit to first-seen through the Frankfurt relay, raw data public. Test both during the trial window.

Can I move my Yellowstone client between Triton and rpc edge?

Yes - that's the standard working as designed. Change the endpoint and credentials and the same client code runs. Migration in either direction is a config change, not a rewrite.

◆ GET ACCESS

Benchmark rpc edge against Triton.

Triton One built the rails this category runs on. We put those rails in the same rack as a sender, priced them flat, and removed the deposit. If your client already speaks Yellowstone, trying rpc edge costs a config change and nothing else for 15 days.

Get Started →Talk to the infra team →

WHERE rpc edge WINS

Entry friction
Transaction sender
Published benchmarks